Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Demolition Order in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Show Cause Notice Was Issued Before Demolition Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The court held that Section 351 requires a notice before demolition, and failure to do so renders the demolition illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 43
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, M/s. B.D. Jogani & Company and its partners, were occupants of premises in Jaywant Industrial Estate, Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) demolished a part of their structure without issuing any prior show cause notice. The appellants challenged the demolition by filing an appeal under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The trial court dismissed their application, leading to the present appeal. The key legal issue was whether the demolition without notice violated principles of natural justice. The appellants argued that Section 351 mandates a notice before demolition, while the respondents contended that the structure was unauthorized and demolition was justified. The court analyzed Section 351 and held that it requires the Commissioner to give a notice to the owner or occupier before demolishing any building. Since no such notice was given, the demolition was illegal. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the demolition order, and directed restoration of status quo ante. The court also emphasized that even if the structure was unauthorized, the procedure under the Act must be followed.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Demolition - Natural Justice - Section 351 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - The court considered whether demolition of a structure without prior show cause notice is valid - Held that Section 351 requires a notice to be given before demolition, and failure to do so violates natural justice - The impugned demolition was set aside and status quo ante directed (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the demolition of the appellants' structure by the Municipal Corporation without issuing a show cause notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, is violative of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order set aside. Demolition declared illegal. Status quo ante directed to be restored.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Demolition without notice
  • Section 351 MMC Act
  • 1888
  • Right to be heard
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 65

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.208 OF 2018 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.270 OF 2018

2018-10-12

DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Counsel, a/w. Mr. Vishal Thaker and Ms. Anjali Trivedi, I/by Mr. Vishal Thaker, for the Appellants-Applicants. Mrs. Madhuri More for the Respondent-MCGM. Mr. Prasad Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel, a/w. Mr. Karl Tamboli, Mr. Raghav Gupta, Mr. Kashish Mainkar and Ms. Ankita Sahgwan, I/by M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for Respondent No.3-Society.

M/s. B.D. Jogani & Company, Bhanwarlal D. Jogani, Lalit Bhanwarlal Jogani

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Assistant Engineer (B & F), M.C.G.M., Jaywant Industrial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order dismissing application challenging demolition of structure by Municipal Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of demolition order and restoration of status quo ante.

Filing Reason

Demolition of appellants' structure without prior show cause notice.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed the appellants' application.

Issues

Whether demolition without show cause notice under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1888 is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants: Demolition without notice violates Section 351 and natural justice. Respondents: Structure was unauthorized and demolition was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 mandates a notice before demolition; failure to issue such notice violates principles of natural justice and renders the demolition illegal.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 requires the Commissioner to give a notice to the owner or occupier before demolishing any building. The demolition without notice is violative of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

Appellants filed application before trial court challenging demolition; trial court dismissed application; present appeal against that dismissal.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: 351
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration of Mutation Entry Challenge. Single Judge's Direction to Revenue Authorities to Take Steps Without Hearing Appellants Violates Principles of Na...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers from Temple Property Under HR&CE Act — Writ Petition Disposed with Directions to Initiate Proceedings Under Section 78 Within Twelve Weeks. The court held that HR&CE authorities must protect temple ...