Search Results for "seat and venue"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application in Out-of-State Contract Dispute. Holds That Arbitration Is Not a 'Thing Done' Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and Contract Executed and Performed Outside Maharashtra Is Not Liable to Stamp Duty in Maharashtra.

The applicant, S Satyanarayana & Co, a partnership firm based in Visakhapatnam, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Holds that BSA governed by Benin law with foreign seat cannot be brought under Part I of Arbitration Act, and issue estoppel applies due to dismissal of anti-arbitration injunction.

The Supreme Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by Balaji Steel Trade under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.

The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Floor Test in Madhya Pradesh Assembly Amid Resignation Controversy. Governor's Power to Direct Floor Test is Not Binding on Speaker; Resignations Require Verification.

The case arose from a political crisis in Madhya Pradesh where 22 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) belonging to the Indian National Congress...