Search Results for "rule returnable immediately"

1548 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1548 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Home University Reservation in Technical Courses. Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2017 held intra vires the Act and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 15(4) and 29(2).

The petitioners, eight students from various districts in Maharashtra, filed a writ petition challenging Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election in Gram Panchayat Dispute — No Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 for Failure to Pay Tax When No Tax Was Imposed.

The case involves a dispute regarding the election of the Up-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Sukli, District Akola. The petitioners, who are members of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...