Search Results for "redevelopment permission"

424 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 424 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.

The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.

The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...