Search Results for "rectification order"

903 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 903 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository in Share Rectification Case — CLB Direction Quashed as Without Jurisdiction. NSDL Cannot Be Directed to Issue Notices Regarding Title Disputes Under Section 111A of Companies Act, 1956.

The case involves an appeal by National Securities Depository Ltd. (NSDL) against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 23 November 2010. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rectification Deed — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove possession and title over the suit property, and the rectification deed did not alter the defendant's prior rights.

The appellant, Shubhangi Ramesh Bhatkar, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 15 of 2006 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ratnagiri. Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Rectification Petition Filed by Le Shark Apparel Limited Seeking Cancellation of Respondents' Registered Trade Mark No. 466002 in Class 25. Petition Based on Grounds of Non-Use Under Section 47 and Fraudulent Registration Under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Le Shark Apparel Limited, filed a Commercial Miscellaneous Petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking rectification of the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Stay Suit Pending Rectification. Civil Court Has Concurrent Jurisdiction to Decide Infringement and Validity of Trademark Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries and M/s. Sri Laxmi Vinayaka Rice Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ITAT Order Rejecting Rectification Application as Time-Barred. Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Does Not Confer Power to Condon Delay Beyond Six Months.

The petitioner, Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 03 November 2023, which di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Appellate Authority's Order in GST Appeal Case Due to Erroneous Limitation Calculation. Appellate Authority Failed to Consider Rectification Application's Impact on Limitation Period Under Section 107 of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Making Appeal Filed Within One Week Timely.

The dispute involved a petition challenging the appellate authority's order rejecting an appeal under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on the grou...