KAHC010220972024_1
20 Jul 2026These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...
Search Results for "ready forward"
1110 result(s) found
Found 1110 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Upholding High Court's Decision. Dispute Involved Agreement of Sale with Issues of Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.
10 Jan 2024The appeal arose from a dispute over a registered Agreement of Sale dated 22.11.1990, where appellants 1, 2, and 3 agreed to sell property to responde...
- 590
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.
19 Nov 2012The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Challenging Decree for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Appellants Argue Time Was Essence of Contract and Plaintiff Defaulted on Payment. The Court Frames Issues on Time Essence and Plaintiff's Continuous Readiness and Willingness to Perform.
24 Apr 2026The case arose from a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed against the judgment and decree dated 25.04.20...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.
11 Oct 2013The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.
25 Jun 2010The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...
- 38
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.
2 Sep 2015The appellant, Annarao, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 28.08.1986, allegedly executed by the respondent, Gopal Ra...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Upholding Trial Court's Finding of Failure to Prove Fraudulent Sale Deed. Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Challenges Dismissal of Suit Where Plaintiff Claimed Agreement of Sale, But Trial Court Found No Proof That Subsequent Registered Sale Deed Was Invalid.
20 May 2021The matter originated as a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale. The plaintiff (appellant) claimed that he was a tenant under one J.A...
- 35
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resolution Plans Under IBC.
5 Mar 2026The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 30.01.2...
- 417
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...
- 3734
