Search Results for "provident fund deduction"

127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurance Company, Holds Mediclaim Amount Not Deductible from Motor Accident Compensation. Contractual Insurance Benefit Is Independent of Statutory Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Cannot Be Deducted to Avoid Double Recovery.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the question whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim policy are deductible from the compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Rules for Compassionate Assistance in Motor Accident Compensation -- Appellants Appeals Against High Court Orders on Deduction of Haryana Government Scheme Benefits

The Supreme Court addressed appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Limited challenging High Court orders regarding deduction of compassio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits Against APMC. Court Directs Payment of Provident Fund, Leave Encashment, and Salary Differences as Per Seventh Pay Commission, Upholding Order of District Deputy Registrar.

The petitioner, Laxman Vitthalrao Motegaonkar, was appointed as Junior Clerk by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Sangamner, on 09.09....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Commissioner's Order Under Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Recovery Certificate for Backwages Upheld Despite Bank's Claim of Limitation and Set-Off

The petitioner, The Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/03/2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was a Software Engineer Aged 39 Years. Tribunal's multiplier of 13 and failure to add future prospects were corrected, resulting in enhanced compensation of Rs.1,18,99,000/-.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the wife, minor daughter, and parents of the deceased Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi, against the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Compromise Terms Binding on Liquidator. Recovery Certificate for Rs.4,44,216/- upheld as compromise was validly entered into and not challenged.

The Petitioner, Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Liquidator, challenged an order dated 16 October 1998 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai,...