Search Results for "promotion bar"

605 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 605 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Age Limit for Promotion of Anganwadi Sevikas to Supervisors. Rule 7(1)(c) of Service Entry Rules, 2021, prescribing 45 years as maximum age for promotion, held not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioners, ten Anganwadi Sevikas from Akola district, challenged Rule 7(1)(c) of the Service Entry Rules, 2021, which prescribed a maximum age l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to CAT Order Directing Reconsideration of Induction into Indian Forest Service. Delay in Cadre Review Does Not Extinguish Right of State Forest Officer to Be Considered for Induction Under Regulation 5(3) of IFS (Cadre) Regulations, 1966.

The State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 9 October 2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WP(MD)No.6979 of 2021

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Kerala High Court Judgment Upholding CAT Order for Inclusion in Promotion Panel. Delay and Laches Not a Bar as Representation Was Replied and Tribunal Condoned Delay.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer (APO) in the Southern Railway under the 30% Limited Departmental...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reconsiders Seniority Bypass in Principal Appointments at Minority Institution Following Supreme Court Remand. The Court Examines Whether Appointments Under Goa School Education Rules, 1986 Were in Breach of Rules 74 and 86, Balancing Minority Rights Under Article 30.

(1) Background: The petitioner, a teacher in a higher secondary school run by the Diocesan Society (a minority educational institution receiving gover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Periodical Promotion Scheme Benefits from 1994 for Non-Teaching Employees. Discrimination in Implementation of G.R. dated 12th July 2004 Quashed as Arbitrary.

The Petitioners, nine Class 'C' and 'D' non-teaching employees of various educational institutions in Sangli and Satara districts, filed a writ petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion to Branch Manager in Shabari Tribal Financial Development Corporation Ltd. — Held that Petitioner's Candidature for Promotion to Class-I Post Must Be Considered as Per Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, Shridhar Sambhaji Dhale, possessed a Master's degree in Commerce and joined as Junior Assistant in 1979 with the Maharashtra State Co-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Respondent's Claim of Reduction in Rank, Holds Mere Reversion from Officiating Post Not Violative of Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India. The Court distinguished Vaikunthe's case, finding that reversion without permanent bar to promotion does not attract Article 311(2).

The case arose from the Southern Railway where the respondent, S. Raghavendrachar, was originally employed as a Train Examiner in the pay scale of Rs....