Search Results for "procedural delay"

1974 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1974 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Applications in Land Acquisition Appeals — Limitation Act Section 5 Not Applicable to State for Delay Beyond 30 Days in Filing Appeals Under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act.

The judgment pertains to multiple civil applications filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers (the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Divi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Condonation of Delay in Section 140 Motor Accident Claim — No Limitation Prescribed for No-Fault Compensation. Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Application for Condonation of Delay as Section 140 Does Not Prescribe Any Limitation Period.

The petitioner, Ramesh Bhimrao Patil, was injured in a motor accident that occurred on 24 November 1989. He filed an application under Section 166 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...