Search Results for "preventive action"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "preventive action"

423 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 423 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Public Order Nexus. The court held that a 133-day delay between the last prejudicial act and the detention order, without explanation, severed the live link required under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act, 1981, and the solitary offence did not establish a threat to public order under Section 2(b-1).

16 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a criminal writ petition challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

27 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Lack of Proximity Between Adverse Cases and Ground Case. Mere Criminal Involvement Insufficient for Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as Cases Could Be Dealt with Under Ordinary Law.

28 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Susila, mother of the detenu Aro @ Arokiyam, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court in SICA Case on Unsecured Creditor Rights - Sanctioned Rehabilitation Scheme Binding on All Creditors. Court held that under Sections 18(8) and 32 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, unsecured creditors cannot opt out of scaled-down payments and must accept scheme terms for company revival.

17 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals concerning the binding effect of rehabilitation schemes sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Direction Restricting Homeopathy Practitioners to Immunity Boosters Only. Court Holds That AYUSH Guidelines Permit Symptom Management and Add-On Interventions for COVID-19, and Threat of Action Under Disaster Management Act Was Unwarranted.

21 Sep 2020

The appeal arose from a Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court dated 21.08.2020 in Writ Petition (C) No.9459 of 2020. The writ petition was ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Detenu's brother successfully challenged preventive detention as the detaining authority did not consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers Act, 1985.

26 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Suresh B. Shetty, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in judicial custody; detaining authority failed to consider less restrictive alternatives under ordinary law, rendering detention order invalid.

27 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Mahesh V. Amesur, cousin of Jeetu Shankarlal Chhapru, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Gap of Nearly One Year Between Issuance and Execution Without Reconsideration of Changed Circumstances. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Detenu Was in Judicial Custody at Time of Execution, Though on Bail When Order Was Issued.

5 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Raja @ Rajesh Rajan Nair, challenged his detention order dated 30th September 2003 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dan...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)