High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Conviction for Offences Under IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act, and UAPA. Appellant Challenges Trial Court Findings Alleging Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses.
29 Nov 2019...
Search Results for "pistol"
244 result(s) found
Found 244 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Waging War Against State Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 121, 122, 124A IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of incriminating articles and recovery was not witnessed by independent persons.
20 Jul 2016The appellant, Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.I at Gulbarga in Sessions Case No.316/2006 for offences under...
- 59
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Confiscation of Truck Under UP Excise Act — Collector's Confiscation Power Not Exclusive When Criminal Trial Is Pending. Magistrate Retains Jurisdiction Over Seized Property Under CrPC When IPC Offences Are Also Involved.
20 Aug 2019The appellant, owner of a truck seized for transporting 154 cartons of illicit liquor along with a country-made pistol and live cartridges, challenged...
- 355
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1)A and 27(2) of the Arms Act was overturned as the sole eyewitness's testimony was found untrustworthy and unnatural, failing to meet the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
16 Mar 2023The Supreme Court heard an appeal against the conviction of the appellant for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code a...
- 286
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused as Prosecution Failed to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120-B, 302 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.
8 Apr 2014The State of Goa appealed against the judgment dated 10.07.2003 passed by the Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 18/2000, whereby respondent nos. 1, ...
- 142
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bangladeshi National in NDPS Case — No Conscious Possession of Narcotics Established. Petitioner's Toilet Kit Contained 0.5 gm Heroin Without His Knowledge; Court Held That Mere Presence of Contraband in Baggage Without Awareness Does Not Constitute Offence Under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act, 1985.
14 Nov 2017The petitioner, M. A. Latif Shahrear Zahedee, a Bangladeshi national and businessman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
- 185
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.
20 Dec 2024The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...
- 370
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Officers. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of weapons held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.
1 Jul 2022The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act set aside as sole identification by witness was doubtful and not supported by other evidence.
1 Dec 2015The appellant, Maqbal Ahmed Gulam Mohd. Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai for offences under Section 392 read ...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of a Minor, Upholding Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and DNA Match. The Court Holds That the Brutal Sexual Assault and Killing of a Six-Year-Old Girl Falls Within the Rarest of Rare Category Warranting the Death Penalty Under Sections 302, 376, 377, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.
14 Oct 2015The case arose from a reference for confirmation of death sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, and an appeal by the convict. The ...
- 26
