High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "past performance"
975 result(s) found
Found 975 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Period of Bona Fide Prosecution of Earlier Proceedings Excluded for Limitation Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend the plaint to seek exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a suit and appeal in the Small Causes Court, holding that such amendment is necessary for determining the real controversy and does not change the nature of the suit.
10 May 2013The plaintiff, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance against the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The su...
- 179
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Reviews Disqualification in Public Works Tender for Technical Bid Irregularities. Writ Jurisdiction Exercised to Examine Alleged Arbitrary Rejection of Bid Under Article 14 amid Dispute over Masonry Experience Certificates.
25 Jul 2025The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging the disqualification of the petitioner from the t...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance and Easement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Right of Way. Court holds that permissive user does not create easement of necessity or prescriptive easement under Indian Easements Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appellant, Smt. Shalini Laxman Wadnerkar, as the sole surviving legal representative of the original plaintiff G.G. Suvarnapathak, appealed agains...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award in Municipal Solid Waste Management Contract. Court upholds Municipal Corporation's decision to award contract to lowest bidder, rejecting allegations of bias and procedural irregularities.
3 Sep 2018The petitioners, M.E.Infraprojects Pvt.Ltd and K.K.Carrier, formed a joint venture and participated in an e-tender issued by the Municipal Corporation...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Prisoners Despite Past Overstay on Parole — Overstay Not a Permanent Bar Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959. The Court held that furlough is a right of a prisoner and past overstay on parole cannot be a permanent bar for grant of furlough.
28 Jun 2006The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners whose applications for furlough leave were rejected by the prison authorities o...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.
13 Jan 2026The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Tribunal's Findings on Payment for Additional Work, Restricted Quantities, and Extension of Time Under General Conditions of Contract.
24 Jun 2025The dispute arose from a railway construction contract between Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway (Railways) and PLR HC RBR JV...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Appellate Court Erred in Modifying Decree Without Cross-Appeal. Order of Refund of Earnest Money Restored as Appellate Court Could Not Set Aside Relief Granted to Plaintiff in Absence of Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC.
5 Feb 2015The appellant, Ghodganga Sakhar Karkhana, a registered cooperative society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 12 August 1991...
- 206
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.
30 Aug 2018The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...
- 41
