Madras High Court Hears Appeal Against Partition Decree in Joint Family Property Suit. Appeal Filed Under Section 96 of CPC Seeks to Set Aside Decree Granting 1/4th Share to Plaintiff in Intestate Succession Case.
6 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "partner's share"
688 result(s) found
Found 688 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Unregistered Partnership Deed for Reference to Arbitration. Section 69(3) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 does not bar a suit for dissolution of an unregistered firm or for accounts if the partnership is established by other evidence.
25 Oct 2023The case involves a dispute between the appellants (Azizur Rehman Gulam Rasool and Jabbar Gulam Rassol Jamal) and the respondents (M/s. Radio Restaura...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dissolution Case — Limitation Bar Cannot Be Raised for First Time in Appeal Without Pleadings. Division Bench Correctly Set Aside Single Judge's Order on Limitation Issue Not Raised in Trial Court.
16 May 2024The present appeal arises from a partnership dispute. The plaintiff, S. Raghuraj Reddy, along with other partners, constituted a partnership firm, M/s...
- 437
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Settlement Discharge in Sales Tax Dues. Settlement Not Binding on Tax Authorities Without Formal Acceptance Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
3 Feb 2006The petitioner, Pradip Nanjee Gala, as Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that a settlement arrived at wit...
- 215
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Stay of Suit Under Section 10 CPC — No Identity of Subject Matter Between Two Suits. The court held that a suit for dissolution of partnership and accounts is not directly and substantially the same as a suit for induction as a partner and injunction, and therefore Section 10 CPC does not apply.
23 Dec 2005The petitioners, M/s. Sadguru Constructions and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6.10.2005 passed by the 8th Joint Civil Judg...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court held that disputes regarding partnership accounts and alleged mismanagement must be resolved through arbitration, not by appointing receiver at interim stage.
22 Aug 2014The petitioner, Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court hears and determines Notice of Motion No. 1211 of 2014 in Suit No. 777 of 2014 seeking interim injunctions and appointment of administrator. The court examines rival claims of family arrangements and fiduciary capacity over Gopal Raheja Group assets.
5 Jan 2026The dispute arose out of the affairs of the Gopal Raheja Group, a real estate business originally established by Lachmandas Raheja and continued by hi...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Set Aside Parts of Arbitral Award on Partnership Trademark Ownership. Clause 6 of 2003 Partnership Deed Excluded Trademarks, Goodwill, and Name from Partnership Assets, Vesting Them Exclusively in Two Individuals.
6 May 2015The Bombay High Court heard two cross-petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from an arbitral award d...
- 11
High Court
High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.
4 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...
- 265
High Court
Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.
21 Jan 2025The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...
- 39
