Search Results for "partial award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "partial award"

261 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 261 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal of Injured Minor Pillion Rider in Motor Accident Case — Negligence Apportionment Set Aside and Compensation Enhanced. The Court held that a pillion rider cannot be held guilty of contributory negligence in a case of composite negligence under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and enhanced compensation from Rs. 1,80,000/- to Rs. 3,50,000/-.

17 Feb 2026

The case involves a minor pillion rider, Divya Kantibhai Vankar, who sustained grievous injuries in a motor accident on 09.02.2015 when a Mahindra Pic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Building Agreement — Penalty Clause Upheld as Genuine Pre-Estimate of Damages. Court holds that Clause 7 penalty @ ₹10,000 per day for delay is not a secondary obligation but a genuine pre-estimate of damages, and forfeiture of earnest money under Clause 13 is permissible only if no other damages are awarded.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 09.04.2010 between the owners (Bhupesh Bhayana and Kiran Bhayana) and the builder (Vinod Seth, now represent...

High Court

Reaffirming Arbitral Awards: Indian High Court Upholds International Arbitration Award.

27 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court enforced an arbitral award passed by the International Court of Arbitration, London, affirming the legality of an assignment of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Equipment Supply Dispute — Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Court Intervention. Existence of Arbitration Clause Confirmed; Court's Role Limited to Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Master Drilling India Private Limited, entered into an Equipment Supply Agreement dated 01.10.2021 with the respondent, Sarel Drill & ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Permanent Disability at Young Age in Motor Accident Claim. The Court held that quantification of non-pecuniary damages requires careful consideration, especially when the claimant suffers permanent disability at a young age under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Jan 2022

The appellant, Basavaraj, aged 21, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a road ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Award Case, Confirming Award for Referred Dispute While Setting Aside Excess Claims. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Deciding Disputes Beyond Scope of Bina Project Agreement Under Sections 2(a), 8, and 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Leading to Partial Quashing of Award.

25 Nov 2021

The dispute originated from a construction contract awarded to Saluja Construction Company by Northern Coalfields Limited for building 100 B-Type Quar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Health Insurance Renewal Petitions Against United India Insurance Company — Insurer Cannot Refuse Renewal Based on Pre-existing Disease Exclusion After Continuous Coverage Under Group Policy. The court held that the exclusion clause for pre-existing diseases applies only at the inception of the first policy and not at renewal, and that refusal to renew was arbitrary.

19 Aug 2013

The petitioners, account holders of Bank of Maharashtra, were covered under a group health insurance scheme called 'Mahabank Swasthya Yojna' provided ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards.

18 Nov 2010

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Gras...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)