Search Results for "panchayat resolution"

744 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 744 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Vacancy of Panchayat Seat and Quo Warranto Against Panch. Petitioner Failed to Establish That Respondent No. 2 Was Disqualified Under Section 10(1)(c) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for Having More Than Two Children.

The petitioner, Mr. Mansoor Mulla, a citizen and voter from Ward No. 9 of Curti, Ponda, Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch and Upsarpanch in No-Confidence Motion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 17. Failure to Move Motion as Mandated Renders Subsequent Notice Invalid Under Section 35(3A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Ravindra Sukhdeo Sanap (Sarpanch) and Vishnu Eknath Nagare (Upsarpanch) of Gram Panchayat Andhera, challenged a notice dated 07.12.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Divisional Commissioner's Order on Sarpanch Resignation Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Procedural Non-Compliance Leads to Upholding of Resignation Dispute

The petitioners, filed a writ petition against the Divisional Commissioner's order allowing an appeal by Respondent No. 1, Sarpanch, regarding the gen...