Search Results for "pancha witness"

588 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 588 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Suffered from Inconsistencies and Was Not Corroborated by Medical Evidence or Other Witnesses.

The appellant, Haridas s/o Kundlik Pokale, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Beed on 06.10.2015 for offences under Sections 498-A and 302 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Communal Riots Case — Sentence Enhanced to Seven Years. The Court affirmed that identification by injured eyewitness and recovery of weapons on appellant's confession were sufficient to prove guilt under Section 307 read with Section 114 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Mustak @ Kanio Ahmed Shaikh against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed his convictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 324, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 6, were convicted by the Ist Ad hoc Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, on 8.5.2007 in Sessions Case No.102 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction based on testimony of interested witnesses held sustainable despite acquittal of co-accused.

The appellant, Kishor, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, for the murder of Angad under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Two Convicts in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Gang Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two appeals by convicts Ananda Sawant and Kunal Gaikwad against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar in Special...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeal in Familial Homicide – Accused Claims Exception Under Section 300 IPC for Grave and Sudden Provocation Based on Alleged Impotency Remarks.

The case arose from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Solapur under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Examines Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC — Judgment Incomplete. Accused's Extra-Judicial Confession to Social Worker and Circumstantial Evidence Assessed Without Final Determination.

The appeal arose from a sessions trial where the accused, a practising lawyer, was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...