Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction based on testimony of interested witnesses held sustainable despite acquittal of co-accused.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kishor, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, for the murder of Angad under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 09.09.2015 when the deceased was playing cards with the accused. A quarrel took place, and later the appellant along with two others allegedly attacked the deceased, with the appellant stabbing him. The deceased was taken to the hospital but declared dead. The brother of the deceased, PW1 Mukund, lodged a report leading to the registration of a crime. After investigation, all three accused were charge-sheeted. The trial court convicted only the appellant, acquitting the other two. The appellant appealed, arguing that the conviction was based on the testimony of interested witnesses (relatives) and that no independent witness was examined. The High Court, after hearing submissions, upheld the conviction, finding the evidence of the relatives credible and sufficient to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the acquittal of co-accused does not automatically affect the appellant's conviction.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on testimony of relatives - The appellant was convicted for murdering the deceased by stabbing during a quarrel over a card game. The court held that the testimony of interested witnesses, being relatives of the deceased, is not necessarily unreliable and can form the basis of conviction if found credible and corroborated. The acquittal of co-accused does not ipso facto vitiate the conviction of the appellant. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the testimony of interested witnesses and in light of the acquittal of co-accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Interested witnesses
  • Credibility of relatives
  • Acquittal of co-accused
  • Circumstantial evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (11) 4

Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 2018

2023-11-08

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Abhay S. Waghwase

2023:BHC-AUG:24340-DB

Mr. Vilas P. Sawant for Appellant, Mrs. V. S. Choudhari for Respondent

Kishor S/o. Laxman Mungulwar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks acquittal by setting aside conviction and sentence

Filing Reason

Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for stabbing deceased during a card game quarrel

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant and acquitted co-accused

Issues

Whether conviction based on testimony of interested witnesses is sustainable Whether acquittal of co-accused affects appellant's conviction

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argues conviction is based on interested witnesses (relatives) and no independent witness examined Appellant points out that co-accused were acquitted on same evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Testimony of interested witnesses, being relatives of the deceased, can be relied upon if found credible and corroborated. Acquittal of co-accused does not automatically vitiate conviction of appellant.

Judgment Excerpts

Instant appeal arises out of judgment and order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, Dist. Beed dated 09.12.2016 in Sessions Case No.52 of 2015, holding present appellant Kishor guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-. On 09.09.2015, deceased Angad was playing cards with accused at around 3:00 p.m.. Quarrel took place between accused no.1 Kishor and deceased. At around 5:00 p.m., accused Nos.1 to 3 came to the spot where deceased was sitting and accused no.1 Kishor stabbed him, whereas other accused beat by stone, fists and kick blows.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 09.12.2016; appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 2018 before Bombay High Court; appeal reserved on 03.11.2023 and pronounced on 08.11.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Unilateral Conveyance Certificate Under MOFA Due to Lack of Notice and Jurisdiction -- Co-Owners' Rights Upheld in Property Dispute Involving Lease and Deed of Assignment
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Landowners in Land Acquisition Restitution Matter — High Court's Direction to Pay Interest on Excess Compensation Upheld. Restitution Under Section 144 CPC Includes Interest as Consequence of Variation of Compensat...