Search Results for "oral partition"

857 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 857 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in CPC Application Rejection Case - Application under Order VII Rule XI of CPC for rejection of plaint was rightly dismissed as the appellants failed to establish grounds for rejection.

The dispute arose from a property partition involving land in Survey Nos. 700/A7B and 706/A9 of Nandyal Town, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal by Divided Son in Hindu Joint Family Property Dispute. Son who separated from father prior to 1956 is entitled to share in ancestral property as per Mitakshara law and Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves two regular first appeals (RFA No.100007/2014 and RFA No.100028/2014) arising from a common judgment and decree dated 25.10.2013 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Fact in Property Dispute, Sets Aside High Court's Interference Under Section 100 CPC. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Holding Unregistered Partition List Inadmissible Without Considering Collateral Use.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the original defendants, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the concurrent findings o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Appeal Due to Lack of Evidence of Joint Family Property. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the suit property was ancestral or joint family property, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for partition of property claiming it was ancestral/joint family property. The trial court dismissed the suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Partition Suit, Remands for Mesne Profits Inquiry Under Order 20 Rule 18 CPC. The court upheld the District Judge's order setting aside the trial court's execution order and remanding for inquiry into mesne profits.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a common judgment of the District Court, Dadra & Nagar Haveli at Silvasa, in Misc. Civil Appeal No.1...