Search Results for "officiation"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition in Seniority Dispute Over B.Ed. Qualification Date. Education Officer's decision set aside for misinterpreting Schedule F of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981.

The case involves a dispute between two teachers employed by the Garison Children Education Society in Khadki. The Petitioner, Mrs. Lakhwinder Kaur Gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition in Seniority Dispute Over B.Ed. Qualification Date. Education Officer's decision to exclude service period due to D.Ed pay scale held erroneous under Schedule F of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981.

The dispute in this case relates to the interse seniority between the Petitioner, Mrs. Lakhwinder Kaur Gurai, and the Third Respondent, both teachers ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds/Quashes (Outcome Not Specified) Circular and Seniority List in Reservation Promotions Dispute. Petitions by General Category Officers Challenging Implementation of Reservation in Promotions for SC/ST in KPTCL on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Supreme Court Directives.

These three writ petitions were filed by officers of the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) belonging to the General Category, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List of Section Supervisors in EPFO. Seniority Determined by Date of Promotion, Not by Date of Eligibility, Upheld by CAT.

The petitioners, Smt. L.M. Mahadik and Shri S.D. Jagtap, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Seniority List of Graduate High School Teachers — Directs Inclusion of Petitioner with Continuous Service from 1988. Sahitya Sudhakar Qualification Treated as Equivalent to Graduation for Seniority Purposes Under Zilla Parishad Service Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Jaiprakash Baburao Gaidhane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the final seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List Revision. B.P.Ed. Teachers Not Entitled to Count Seniority Before Government Resolution of 25.11.1988.

Background: A group of writ petitions was filed by Headmasters, a Supervisor, and Assistant Teachers of schools run by Maratha Shikshan Sanstha, who h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute for Headmaster Post Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act. Seniority Determined by Date of Appointment in Category, Not Date of Acquiring Higher Qualification.

The case involves a dispute over seniority for promotion to the post of Headmaster in a private school in Maharashtra. The appellant, Madhavi, was app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...