Search Results for "narcotics"

249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR in NDPS Act Case — Ignorance of Gazette Notification Not a Defence. Export of Controlled Substance Without NOC from Narcotics Commissioner Constitutes Prima Facie Offence Under Sections 9A, 25A, 29, 59 of NDPS Act.

The applicant, a director of Vivalavita Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., sought quashing of FIR No. 48 of 2019 registered by the Anti Drug Department, Azad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Doubtful Seizure — Conviction for Possession of Ganja Set Aside as Search of Vehicle Without Personal Search of Accused Renders Trial Vitiated.

The case involves two appeals by Madansingh Kamalsingh Rajput and Savairam Devla Jadhav against their conviction under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appeal was filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau against the acquittal of the respondent for an offence under Section 21 read with Section 8(c) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Non-Communication of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Dinesh Palyekar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) — Conviction for Possession of Charas Set Aside as Search and Seizure Vitiated by Failure to Transmit Information to Immediate Official Superior.

The appellants, Daulatram @Dolly Trilok Singh, Shahmohammed Salatmatmiya Shah, and Bampada @Bamdeo @Ity Sanatan Adak, were convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Bail Conditions for Foreign Accused in NDPS Case: Embassy Certificate Condition Unworkable, GPS Tracking Violates Article 21. The court held that alternative conditions such as impounding passport and periodic reporting are sufficient to secure the accused's presence.

The appellant, a Nigerian national, was arrested on 21st May 2014 for offences under Sections 8, 22, 23, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Search and Seizure of Charas from Hotel Room Vitiated as Mandatory Procedural Safeguards Not Followed.

The appellant, Dhansur Ghartimagar, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Section 20(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to comply with Sections 42 and 50 of the Act.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court under Section 20(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Export of Product Containing Methyl Ethyl Ketone Without NOC. Interpretation of Schedule-B of NDPS (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order, 2013 Requires Factual Investigation.

The petitioner, Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that it is not required to obtain a No Objection Cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...