Search Results for "mining offences"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Quashing of FIR in Airport Trespass Case — Mala Fides Cannot Be Decided at Nascent Stage of Investigation. IPC Offences Can Coexist with Aircraft Act Offences; Section 12B Does Not Bar FIR Registration.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Jharkhand against a judgment of the Jharkhand High Court quashing FIR No.169 of 2022 register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Illegal Mining Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Mines and Mineral Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of minerals beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Dinesh and Cheluvamurthy, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions and Special Judge at Mysuru in Special Case No.85/2018 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions in Coal Supply Contract Dispute — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction. Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills Challenged, but Court Holds Alternative Remedy of Arbitration Available.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Charges Under SC/ST Act for Lack of Public View Element in Caste-Based Insult Allegation. Offence under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires insult to be in public view, which was absent as incident occurred inside a house.

This judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by three applicants (original accused) challenging an order dated 07/09/2015 passed by...