Search Results for "market area declaration"

515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Market Value Assessment Based on Auction Sale Prices with Deductions for Development Held Reasonable, Affirming High Court's Decision.

The dispute arose from cross-appeals concerning the assessment of market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in Narsingi and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Losers' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Improper Reliance on Government Floor Rates. Market Value Must Be Determined Based on Sale Exemplars Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Small Sale Instances Cannot Be Ignored for Large Tracts.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands in Sultanpur, Gurugram, for constructing Express Highway Phase VII under the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Both Challenges to Court Receiver's Royalty Fixation in Family Property Dispute. Court upholds Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs. 1,50,000/- per month, finding no perversity or lack of material.

The dispute arises out of a family property and business conflict between the plaintiff, Majid Ahmedbhai Oomerbhoy, and the defendants, including Rash...