Search Results for "limited review"

3927 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3927 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order on Condonation of Delay in Review Application — Limitation for Review Under Section 17 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Governed by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Review Petition Due to Unexplained Delay of 1679 Days. Condonation of Delay Denied as Limitation Expired Before COVID-19 Pandemic and No Sufficient Cause Shown.

The State of Maharashtra and others filed a Review Petition (Stamp) No. 19950 of 2022 seeking review of a judgment dated 15 November 2017 in Writ Peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Payment — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument on merits not permitted.

The judgment concerns a batch of review petitions filed against a common judgment dated 18th December 2013 passed by the Bombay High Court in several ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Contempt Case for Violation of Asset Restraint Orders. The court found that the review petitioner failed to show any error apparent on record justifying interference, as the omitted reply did not contradict the factual basis of the contempt findings.

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya against the judgment dated 09.05.2017, which had found him guilty of contempt o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Service Matter — Upholds Denial of Selection Grade to Polytechnic Lecturers. Lecturers appointed on consolidated pay not entitled to selection grade under Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 as they were not regularized.

The case involves five review applications filed by lecturers of polytechnic colleges in Tamil Nadu against a common judgment dated 18.12.2025 in W.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process.

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute Over Will — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC cannot be used to re-argue the case or correct erroneous findings unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants (original appellants) filed a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seek...