Search Results for "legal bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "legal bar"

6664 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6664 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging University Regulations on Migration from 3-Year LL.B to 5-Year Integrated Law Course. The court held that the Bar Council of India Rules of Legal Education, 2008 do not permit migration from a 3-year LL.B course to a 5-year integrated law course, and the university regulations were valid.

27 Aug 2018

The petitioners, two students who had completed a 3-year LL.B degree course, sought to migrate to the 4th year of a 5-year integrated B.A., LL.B cours...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Advocate's Re-Enrollment After Surrender of Sanad During COVID-19. Karnataka Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1983 Does Not Bar Re-Entry; Right to Practice Under Article 19(1)(g) Upheld.

28 Jun 2024

The petitioner, Shri Channabasappa Lingappa Mokhashi, enrolled as an advocate with the then Mysore Bar Council on 17-07-1973 and practiced continuousl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Service Matter Involving Efficiency Bar Under Civil Service Rules. Express Order Under Rule 38 of Hyderabad Civil Services Rules and Rule 52 of Mysore Civil Service Rules Required for Crossing Efficiency Bar; Dropping of Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Automatically Constitute Sanction.

1 Sep 1969

The dispute arose out of a writ petition filed by an executive engineer who had served in the Public Works Department of the erstwhile Hyderabad State...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores 25% LDCE Quota for District Judges and Reforms Judicial Recruitment in All India Judges Association Case. The Court addresses eight issues including LDCE quota restoration, minimum experience reduction, merit quota, suitability test, and practice requirement for Civil Judge (Junior Division) examination.

17 Jul 2025

This judgment by the Supreme Court of India addresses multiple applications in the ongoing All India Judges Association case concerning the qualificat...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Quashes Criminal Proceedings for MMDR Act Violations as Police cannot Investigate Barred Offences. Proceedings Initiated by Police for Offences under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 22, Allowing Continuation of IPC Investigations.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad adjudicated a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.

9 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging SOP for Physical Hearing During COVID-19 Pandemic — Court Holds That Administrative Decisions During Extraordinary Circumstances Are Not Subject to Judicial Review Unless Arbitrary or Malafide

26 Jun 2020

The petitioner, Sri Rajadithya Sadasivan, an advocate with 14 years of standing, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)