Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "khata"
345 result(s) found
Found 345 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Public Property. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.
20 Mar 2025The petitioners-defendants filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the Senior Civil Jud...
- 25
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Res Judicata Not Applicable as Earlier Suit Was Only for Injunction, Not Title. Former Students' Suit in Representative Capacity for Declaration of Government Ownership Maintainable Despite Earlier Injunction Decree.
10 Mar 2025The dispute pertains to a suit property bearing Sy.No.81 of Tumkur, originally belonging to Syed Md. Bokhari and Lankey. Due to non-payment of arrears...
- 685
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Council to Demolish Unauthorised Construction in Neighbour Dispute — Upholds Duty of Municipal Authority Under MRTP Act Despite Pending Civil Suit. Writ Petition Maintainable as Municipal Authority's Statutory Duty is Independent of Civil Court Proceedings.
7 Feb 2025The petitioners, flat purchasers residing in Baramati, Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a directive ...
- 1235
High Court
Bombay High Court Resolves Difference on Quantum of Exemplary Costs in Hoarding Dispute — Imposes Rs.15,00,000 Costs for Suppression and Misstatement. Court holds that costs must be proportionate to conduct and commercial gains, balancing deterrence and proportionality under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Chapter XVII Rule 16 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.
14 Nov 2024The petitioner, Pawan Advertising, installed hoardings after obtaining permission from the Grampanchayat, but without the required permission from the...
- 254
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within 12 Months of Purchase Notice. Land Reserved for Parking Released as Authorities Took No Steps After Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
4 May 2023The petitioners, owners of land bearing CTS No. 352 & 352A, Final Plot No. 131/1, 131/2 in Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Developer in BDA Land Dispute — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as BDA Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Issuing Demolition Notice Under Section 14 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.
5 Jul 2022The petitioner, M/s Vandana Infra Estates, a partnership firm engaged in construction and allied activities, entered into Joint Development Agreements...
- 115
High Court
Karnataka High Court Directs Tahsildar to Restore Khata and RTC in Land Dispute Based on Civil Court Decree. Revenue Authorities Bound to Implement Civil Court Decree in O.S.96/1997.
13 Jul 2020The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent Tahsildar...
- 25
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Over Escheated Property, Upholds High Court's Reversal of Injunction. Patwari's Unauthorized Entry Cannot Confer Sirdari Rights Under Kumaon and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960.
5 Feb 2019The dispute concerns agricultural land in Village Gyansu, District Uttar Kashi, originally owned by Badri Aswal and his wife Tulsa Devi, who died with...
- 268
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part — Honorarium to Elected Secretaries Not Wages Under ESI Act. Mazdoori Khata Paid for Lunch Hour Work Held to Be Wages Under Section 2(22) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.
20 Apr 2016The appellant, Khadi Gramodyog Emporium, Nagpur, was assessed by the respondent, Deputy Regional Director, ESIC, for contribution under the ESI Act in...
- 111
