High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Developer in BDA Land Dispute — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as BDA Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Issuing Demolition Notice Under Section 14 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s Vandana Infra Estates, a partnership firm engaged in construction and allied activities, entered into Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) dated 04.09.2014, 27.09.2014, and 28.10.2014 with the owners of certain properties. The petitioner claimed to be in possession of the schedule property and had constructed a building therein. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a demolition order dated 28.08.2017 bearing No.BDA/EM/EO-III/TA-IV/T-11/2017-18, directing demolition of the construction. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of the demolition order. The petitioner contended that the demolition order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, in gross violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the BDA and the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), were represented by counsel. The court, after hearing the petitioner's senior counsel and the respondents' counsel, observed that the demolition order was passed without any notice to the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of hearing. The court held that such an order cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed, the impugned demolition order was quashed, and the BDA was granted liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuing notice and providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - Demolition Order - Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Section 14 - The petitioner challenged a demolition order passed by the BDA without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and quashed the same, granting liberty to the BDA to proceed afresh after issuing notice and hearing the petitioner. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned demolition order dated 28.08.2017 passed by the Bangalore Development Authority without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order of demolition dated 28.08.2017 bearing No.BDA/EM/EO-III/TA-IV/T-11/2017-18 is quashed. The respondents are at liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuing notice and providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • demolition order
  • BDA Act
  • Section 14
  • writ petition
  • quashing
  • violation of principles of natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (07) 34

Writ Petition No. 40795 of 2017 (BDA)

2022-07-05

Suraj Govindaraj

S.M. Chandrashekar (Senior Counsel for petitioner), Pavana Chandra Shetty.H (Advocate for petitioner), B.S. Sachin (Advocate for R1 & R2), N.R. Jagadeeswara (Advocate for R3)

M/s Vandana Infra Estates

Bangalore Development Authority, The Engineering Office-III, Bangalore Development Authority, The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a demolition order passed by the Bangalore Development Authority.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned demolition order dated 28.08.2017 and costs.

Filing Reason

The demolition order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, in violation of principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the demolition order dated 28.08.2017 passed by the BDA without notice or opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the demolition order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents did not contest the lack of notice but argued on merits.

Ratio Decidendi

An order of demolition passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. The authority must provide an opportunity of hearing before passing such an order.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Quashing the impugned order of demolition dated 28.08.2017... The demolition order has been passed without any notice to the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of hearing. In that view of the matter, the impugned order of demolition cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed. The respondents are at liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuing notice and providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the demolition order dated 28.08.2017 passed by the Bangalore Development Authority. The petition came up for preliminary hearing in 'B' group before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru.

Acts & Sections

  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 14
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Prospective Levy of Land Development Charges Under Section 124A of MRTP Act, 1966 — No Retrospective Recovery for Pre-1992 Permissions. Rain Harvesting Charges and Audit Objections Also Raised.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Developer in BDA Land Dispute — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as BDA Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Issuing Demolition Notice Un...