Search Results for "interim direction"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds 10% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Clause as Valid in Commercial Contracts. Clause requiring deposit-at-call of 10% of claim amount before invoking arbitration is not arbitrary or discriminatory under Article 14.

The case arose from a tender issued in 2008 by the Punjab State Water Supply & Sewerage Board for water supply and sewerage projects. The appellant, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Student's Claim for Compensation for Loss of Academic Year Due to College's Irregular Admissions. Petitioner accepted full and final settlement of Rs 20 lakhs, barring further claims under principles of accord and satisfaction.

The petitioner, Riya George, a medical student, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking compensation from Kannur Medical Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Regularisation of Daily Wage Employee. Appointment Was on Daily Wage Basis, Not Regular Selection Under Rule 22 of Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules 1985.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had directed regularis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...