Search Results for "interest expenditure set off"

584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Tribunal's order setting aside Commissioner's revision under Section 263 upheld as Assessing Officer had made proper inquiries and formed an opinion.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai (appellant-revenue) under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.626 OF 2010

The assessee, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2002-03 declaring a loss of Rs. 45.90 crores and claimed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Act Case Upholding Revisional Jurisdiction. Commissioner Validly Set Aside Assessment Order as Payment to Shareholders Was Not 'Cost of Improvement' Under Capital Gains Computation Under Sections 48 and 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment concerning the sale of a property named 'Paville House' by the respondent assessee, a company engaged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Bank in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessing Officer Had Already Considered Exemption Claim During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 30.03.2001 issued...