Search Results for "initial appointment date"

1526 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1526 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Probation Period — Confirmation Dates Back to Initial Appointment. Movement from Semi-Skilled to Skilled Grade is Confirmation/Upgradation, Not Promotion, and Seniority Must Be Fixed from Date of Initial Appointment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by V. Vincent Velankanni against the Union of India and others, setting aside the judgment of the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.

Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Review Petition Against Order Directing Appointment of Teacher; Emphasizes Limited Scope of Review. Management Argued Error Apparent on Record as Teacher Allegedly Not Full-Time and Post Reserved, but Court Recalls Review Not Appeal and Error Must Be Self-Evident.

The review application arose from a writ petition filed by a teacher seeking regularization as Lecturer in English. The High Court had earlier allowed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to University's Refusal for Permanent Approval of Lecturers. Legal Question Involves NET/SET Exemption for M.Phil Holders Under UGC Regulations.

The Writ Petition No. 5336 of 2012 was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by three lecturers—Ram Raosaheb Pha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to University’s Denial of Permanent Approval to Contractually Appointed Lecturers. Petitioners Alleged Violation of UGC Exemption Norms After Acquiring M.Phil During Continuous Service.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by three lecturers—Ram Phawade, Shivaji Shinde, and Shrimant Bhalke—aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Challenge to Reinstatement of Temporary Employees in Termination Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Prior Approval Under Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Held Illegal.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Solapur University challenging a common order of the College Tribunal, Mumbai, dated 10 January 2...