Search Results for "grocery shop"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "grocery shop"

160 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

19 Dec 2025

The appellant, Vishal Ashok Kamble, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of one person under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case Based on Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement — Daughter's Need Upheld After Amendment. The court held that the landlord's daughter had established her bona fide requirement for the suit premises and that the tenant failed to prove greater hardship, confirming the eviction decree.

9 Dec 2024

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute over commercial premises in Panchgani. The original landlord, Ramchandra Shivram Gadekar, filed a suit for...

High Court

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Improper Reliance on Extra-Judicial Confession. Conviction under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Based on Weak Extra-Judicial Confession and Uncorroborated Circumstances.

10 Mar 2023

The dispute involved an appeal by an accused convicted for murder and related offences. On 01.10.2003, Umesh Chowdhary was allegedly murdered, leading...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay - Imposes Fine Instead of Imprisonment. The Court held that the 31-year delay in appeal disposal constitutes an adequate and special reason to reduce the minimum sentence under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, Tarak Nath Keshari, was convicted under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for possessing mustard oil and veget...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case — Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Demand, and Recovery of Body. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused under Sections 364A, 302, 120-B, 201 read with Section 34 IPC.

24 Apr 2020

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of an 8-year-old boy, Yug, son of Dr. Mukesh Chandak, a dentist in Nagpur. On 1st September 2014, Yug w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder Under Section 304(I) IPC — Stone Blow During Quarrel Over Cotton Sale. The court held that the appellant's act of throwing chilly powder and striking the deceased on the head with a stone was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death, but without intention to cause death, thus falling under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

22 Dec 2017

The appellant, Suraj Shrikrushna Sonowane, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for the offence punishable under Section 304(I) of the India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

16 Sep 2015

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Gang Rape Case — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the testimony of the minor prosecutrix was trustworthy and sufficient to sustain convictions under Sections 376(g), 366(A), and 363 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

24 Jun 2014

The appellants, Narayan s/o Ashok Ragde and Rahim Shah s/o Bashir Shah, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Aurangabad in Sessions Case...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Defendant Trespasser and Orders Possession and Mesne Profits in Partnership Dissolution Dispute. Executor of Deceased Partner Succeeds in Establishing Right to Suit Premises.

2 May 2006

The suit was filed by the original plaintiff Lakchand Dhanji Shah, executor under the will of Narshi Hansraj Khona (deceased), against the defendant N...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)