Search Results for "gratuity"

816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Terminated Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Loss of Property or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority/Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award in Date of Birth Fraud Case. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Not Applicable as Misconduct Did Not Involve Moral Turpitude or Loss to Employer.

The petitioner, Western Coal Fields Limited, a government company, challenged the concurrent orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Gratuity Award in Favour of Dismissed Employee for Fraudulent School Certificate. Forfeiture of Gratuity Upheld Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Misconduct Involving Moral Turpitude.

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority (Assistant Commissioner, Labour, Chandrapur) dated 21.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition of Retired Judicial Member of Railway Claims Tribunal — Notification Denying Pension Quashed as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional. Pension is a right under Article 300A and denial without authority of law is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioner, Prabhakar H. Parab, a retired Judicial Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Superannuated Teachers Association Seeking Pension Revision Under UGC Regulations. UGC Regulations Held Non-Statutory and Not Binding on State Government, No Writ of Mandamus Issued.

The petitioner, Association of College & University Superannuated Teachers (Maharashtra), a registered society, filed a writ petition under Article 22...