Search Results for "exception period six years"

1587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates on Regularization of Muster Roll Workers in Assam. Division Bench's Reversal of Single Judge's Regularization Direction Under Scrutiny.

The present batch of appeals originated from a common judgment and order dated 8th June 2017 passed by the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.6789 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgments on Creamy Layer Determination for OBC Reservation in Civil Services. Inclusion of Salary Income for PSU Employees Under Category II(C) of Office Memorandum Dated 08.09.1993 Found Discriminatory and Set Aside Due to Violation of Article 14.

The Supreme Court dealt with three consolidated civil appeals arising from separate High Court judgments concerning the determination of creamy layer ...