Search Results for "disciplinary enquiry after retirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "disciplinary enquiry after retirement"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order for Non-Furnishing of Disagreement Report in RPF Disciplinary Proceedings. Disciplinary Authority's Failure to Provide Disagreement Report Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, an ex-Constable of the Railway Protection Force (RPF), challenged the order dated 22.11.2021 passed by the Principal Chief Security Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

13 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Against Supervisor in Sexual Harassment Case Under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 — Natural Justice Not Violated as Inquiry Committee Followed Due Process and Findings Were Not Perverse.

29 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Milind Mamlekar, a supervisor in the Estate Section of Goa University, challenged the penalty imposed on him following a complaint of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Disciplinary Matter: Non-Supply of Inquiry Report Before 1990 Not Fatal; Disagreement Reasons Must Be Communicated. The Court restored punishments of reversion and removal from service imposed on a bank employee for gross negligence and fraud.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dealt with two appeals by the State Bank of India against a common High Court order that set aside disciplinary punishments imposed ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Penalty Imposed on Zilla Parishad Employee for Procedural Violation. The court held that the disciplinary authority failed to conduct a proper inquiry under Rule 4(iv) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, and the petitioner was not afforded reasonable opportunity of hearing.

13 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Aniruddha Nagorao Chinchkhedkar, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Upa-Lokayukta Recommendation in Disciplinary Matter — Procedural Fairness Required When Disagreeing with Inquiry Officer. Upa-lokayukta cannot disagree with inquiry officer's findings without providing opportunity of hearing; disciplinary authority must follow natural justice before differing from inquiry officer or Upa-lokayukta.

24 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Sri Shankarappa, an employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the recommendation dated 16.01.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Penalty of Compulsory Retirement with 67% Pensionary Benefits Upheld as Not Disproportionate. Court Held That the Disciplinary Authority's Decision Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With Under Article 226 Unless Shocking or Unreasonable.

20 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Gour Chandra Dutta, a central railway employee, was penalized with compulsory retirement with 67% pensionary benefits following a disc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge Memo Due to Delay and Quasi-Judicial Functions. The Court Held That Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 8 Years for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duties as Income Tax Officer Were Unjustified and Caused Prejudice to the Employee.

13 Feb 2013

The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Admini...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

6 Jan 2012

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Voluntary Retirement Due to Pending Disciplinary Proceedings and CBI Investigation. Rule 56(k) of CCS Rules Does Not Confer Unilateral Right to Retire When Serious Allegations Are Under Investigation.

21 Nov 2005

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Sharma, joined Tata Memorial Hospital as Assistant Surgeon on 29th November 1985 and was later appointed Professor of Surge...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)