Search Results for "discharge under Section 227"

1557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Combined Revision and Writ Petitions Involving Abetment Charge Under IPC and PC Act. Issue of Abetment Surviving Abatement of Principal Offence Arises from Disproportionate Assets Case Against Deceased Public Servant and His Wife.

The matter arose from a disproportionate assets case against a public servant and his wife, accused of criminal misconduct and abetment. The CBI regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Application for Quashing Summons in Security Guards Act Violation. Allegations Against Officers as Principal Employers Prima Facie Disclose Offence Under Clause 42 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.

The matter arose from a criminal complaint filed by Inspector R.D. Khanorkar under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...