Search Results for "depreciation actually allowed"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delayed Appeal for Land Compensation Parity — Interest Denied for Delay Period. Landowners under same acquisition entitled to same compensation as others, but interest denied for 2928 days delay.

The Supreme Court allowed a civil appeal arising from a land acquisition matter where the appellant's land was acquired for the construction of the Hu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Settlement Under Own Policy Bars Further Recovery. Claimant who accepted full and final settlement from his own insurer cannot claim compensation from the opposite insurer for the same damage under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), North Goa, Panaji, dated 18.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Set Off of Unabsorbed Business Loss Against Profits of Erstwhile 10A Unit. Tribunal's Order Allowing Set Off of Brought Forward Loss of Assessment Year 2002-03 Against Profits of 10A Unit in Assessment Year 2005-06 Upheld.

The case involves two appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Raymond Ltd. Tax Case — Multiple Disallowances Deleted by ITAT Upheld. Pre-operative expenses, technical know-how payments, debenture issue costs, and lease rent deductions allowed as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai (Revenue) appealed against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 22 March 2007 for A...