Search Results for "depositors protection"

104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Liquidate Attached Assets and Refund Investors in Collective Investment Scheme Case — Court Emphasizes Need for Time-Bound Disposal and Coordination Between Authorities

The petitioners, who are husband, wife, and their son, were founder-directors of Sai Prasad Properties Ltd and other companies in the Sai Group. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Petitioner in MPID Act Case Due to Long Incarceration Exceeding Maximum Sentence. Petitioner incarcerated for over 7.5 years as undertrial for offences under MPID Act and IPC; court holds further detention violates Article 21.

The Bombay High Court granted bail to a petitioner who had been incarcerated for over seven and a half years as an undertrial in a case under the Maha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under MPID Act Seeking Release of Attached Property — Property Acquired During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Claimed as Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice.

The case involves an appeal filed by Ved Prakash Arya under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Pre-Arrest Bail in Investment Fraud Case — Suppression of Facts Not Proven. Cancellation of anticipatory bail set aside as the applicant had not suppressed material facts and the cancellation was based on unsubstantiated allegations.

The case involves an application by Rajesh Thomas Menzes challenging an order dated 11 May 2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Accused's Petition Challenging Production of Documents by Prosecution Witness Not Part of Charge-Sheet. Witness Can Produce Documents Directly Under Section 293 Cr.P.C. as Charge-Sheet Is Not Exhaustive.

The petitioner, Bhagyashree Prashant Wasankar, is one of the accused in a sessions trial pending before the Additional Sessions Judge-11 at Nagpur. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Chargesheet Not Taken Cognizance Within 90 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues when the chargesheet is not taken cognizance within the prescribed period, even if physically filed earlier.

The applicant, Wasudeo Shrawan Kamble, was arrested on 13 July 2020 in connection with Crime No. 427/2020 registered at Police Station Ballarshah, Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Unlawful Activities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. Applicants Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC as Allegations of Waging War Against Government and Unlawful Activities Not Substantiated.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory ba...