Search Results for "demand verification"

950 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 950 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Statement for Non-Adjustment of Pre-deposits in Service Tax Dispute. Petitioner's pre-deposits and recovered amounts must be adjusted before demanding payment under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

The petitioner, Evershine Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the SVLDRS-3 statement issued by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Pravinbhai Ambalal Shah, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Special Case No. 5 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petitions Filed by Six MBBS Students Challenging Their Dismissal for Impersonation in Entrance Exam Heard by Karnataka High Court. Court Examines Whether Deemed University's Procedure for Detecting Impersonation Followed Natural Justice and Published Rules.

The petitioners were six students who were admitted to the MBBS course at Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, a constituent college of the deemed univers...