Search Results for "dealer protection"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Vendor in Food Adulteration Case Due to Manufacturer's Warranty Defense. Vendor of sealed pan masala held entitled to protection under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 as he sold the product in original manufacturer's sealed package with warranty.

The appellant was convicted under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order Under Maharashtra Money-Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 for Violation of Natural Justice. Order directing return of vehicles passed without hearing the petitioner, who was in possession of vehicles as security for loans, set aside.

The petitioner, Bhimrao Bajarang Chavare, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 March 2022 passed by the Competent Authority under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...