Search Results for "customs adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "customs adjudication"

684 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 684 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Answers Reference on Conflicting Decisions in Customs Import Case — Tribunal's Preference for SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. Upheld. The Court held that the Tribunal correctly followed the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India, which was later confirmed by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court, over Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India.

12 Mar 2010

The applicant, M/s Mewati & Co., sought clearance of two consignments of Neutral Malt Spirit (concentrated whiskey) under a REP license. The Customs o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order for Non-Consideration of Binding Supreme Court Precedent on Jurisdiction of DRI Officer. Tribunal directed to reconsider waiver application in light of Commissioner of Customs vs. Sayed Ali (2011) 265 ELT 17 (SC) regarding Section 2(34) of Customs Act, 1962.

7 Sep 2011

The appellant, Tejus Proprietary Concern of Tejus Rohitkumar Kapadia, filed an appeal against two orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Evidence of Suppression. CESTAT's finding that there was no misdeclaration or suppression of facts by the importer upheld, and the demand for differential duty beyond normal period was barred by limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

21 Sep 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against an order of the Customs Excise and S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Detention of Imported Goods Under Customs Act — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Section 110A. Failure to issue show cause notice within statutory period renders continued detention illegal; court directs release of goods on payment of redemption fine and duty.

8 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Make India Impex, a sole proprietorship through its proprietor Rajesh Nakhua, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

13 Oct 2010

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessees' Appeals in Customs Duty Cases Involving Forged DEPB Scrips. Court upheld duty liability as forged scrips are void ab initio under the Customs Act, 1962, justifying extended limitation period due to fraud, with penalty proceedings remanded for adjudication.

23 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals concerning customs duty evasion cases where appellants had imported goods using forged DEPB (Duty E...

High Court

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Customs Appeals Against Importers as Withdrawn. Commissioner of Customs Sought Permission to Withdraw Appeals Filed Under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 Against CESTAT Order, Which Was Granted.

14 Mar 2025

The Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, filed two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, before the Madurai Bench of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Conditions for Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act. Court holds that pre-deposit of differential duty and interest as condition for provisional release under Section 110A is not warranted and modifies conditions to require only bank guarantee and bond.

25 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Apollo Cranes Pvt. Ltd. and another, imported nine cranes between 17 November 2005 and 6 April 2010, which were assessed and bills of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Customs Confiscation of Foreign Currency — Upholds Rejection of Revision Under Section 129DD of Customs Act, 1962. Petitioner failed to prove lawful acquisition and possession of foreign currency equivalent to Rs. 33,06,667.60, leading to confiscation and penalty.

22 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Jayendra Chandulal Thakkar, was intercepted at Mumbai airport on 14 March 2006 while traveling to Doha. He declared carrying foreign c...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)