Search Results for "concurrent list"

381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Modifying Sentence on Double Punishment Grounds. Separate sentences for offences under Sections 20 and 25/29 from same transaction held impermissible, and fine cannot be cumulative when sentences run concurrently under Section 53 IPC.

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant and a co-accused were intercepted dur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The appellant, Sri Bylamurthy, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the concurrent judgments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Entry Tax on Industrial Townships — Industrial Townships Can Be Treated as 'Local Area' Under Entry 52 List II. Inclusion of industrial townships in definition of 'local area' for entry tax is constitutionally valid and does not violate Article 243-Q.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the validity of entry tax levied on goods entering industrial townships under the Orissa E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...