Search Results for "collective bargaining"

71 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Termination of Teacher. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Earlier Enquiries Are Quashed for Non-Compliance of Rules 36/37 of MEPS Rules, 1981 Are Impermissible.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of the educational institution, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case - Layoff and Lockout by Company Held Illegal. Company's Failure to Obtain Permission Under Section 25M of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Subsequent Lockout Constitute Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Maharashtra General Kamgar Union filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Industrial Court dated 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Seeking Recovery of Interim Wage Order Under Section 50 of MRTU & PULP Act. Section 50 Recovery Only Available for Final Orders Under Chapter VI, Not Interim Orders Under Section 30.

The petitioner, a trade union registered under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU &...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of Another Union.

The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner Union, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, which was a recognized trade union in the undertaking of Respondent No.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Employer in Industrial Dispute Settlement Case — Settlement Binding on All Workmen. Settlement under Section 18(3) read with Section 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is binding on all workmen in the establishment, and Industrial Tribunal cannot ignore it.

The Petitioner, Novartis India Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, employed Medical Representatives in its Pharmaceutical Divi...