Search Results for "closing date"

934 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 934 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition in NIT Seat Allocation Dispute Due to Technical Glitch. The court directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the third round of seat allotment, holding that the petitioner should not be penalized for a technical glitch.

The petitioner, Devendra s/o Nilkanth Deshmukh, a student seeking admission to the first year of Bachelor of Engineering course, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Petitioner to Lead Evidence in Civil Suit Despite Closure Order, Imposing Costs for Dilatory Conduct. The court set aside the trial court's order closing evidence of PW1, granting one final opportunity with costs of Rs. 5,000 to each respondent.

The petitioner, Ignatius Tony Pereira, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 2.9.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Trial Court's Order Closing Plaintiff's Evidence Due to Genuine Reason for Absence. Imposition of Costs as Condition for Setting Aside Closure Order Ensures No Abuse of Process Under Civil Procedure Code.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Union of India through the Central Public Works Department...