Search Results for "claimants' option"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Conversion of Claim Petition from Section 163A to Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Remand for Fresh Adjudication. Claimants permitted to convert claim petition at any stage, including after remand, as per settled law.

The petitioners, original claimants in a motor accident claim, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, following th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation Against Rejection of Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Arbitrator's Findings on Contractual Interpretation and Delay Held Final Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, had invited tenders for re-construction of Zakariya Bunder road in May 1989. Respondent no.1 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...