Search Results for "capital asset"

568 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 568 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim to Treat Compensation as Capital Receipt Under Income Tax Act. Lump sum payment received by managing agent for reduction in remuneration held to be revenue receipt as it was in lieu of future profits and not for loss of managing agency.

The assessee firm, M/s. Godrej & Company, was appointed managing agent of a limited company for thirty years from November 9, 1933, under an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Technical Know-how Fees and Duty Free Advance Licence Issues. Technical know-how fees paid under non-exclusive licence for limited period held revenue expenditure; Duty Free Advance Licence not real income under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal by the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding assessment year 1999-2000. The assessee, M/s Essel Propa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal: Profit from Share Sales Held as Trading Income, Not Capital Gain. Purchase and Quick Resale of Shares with Borrowed Funds and Debiting Interest as Revenue Expenditure Indicated a Well-Planned Scheme to Earn Profits under the Income Tax Act, 1922.

The assessee firm, Juggilal Kamlapat, Kanpur, was engaged in promoting companies and financing sister concerns of the J.K. Group. During the assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Claim for Capital Gains Treatment in Partnership Dissolution Case. Gains from Sale of Land Held as Co-owned Personal Asset Not Business Income Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involved an income tax reference under Section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1988-89. The assessee, an individual ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Capital Gains Liability of Firm on Partner's Retirement. Full Bench resolves conflict under Section 45(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding liability when retiring partner receives only money for his share without distribution of assets.

The case involves an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an order dated 02.03.2006 in ITA No.1295/BANG/2004 for the a...