High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Non-Refundable Deposit for Surrender of Tenancy Rights Held Not Taxable as Capital Gains. The court ruled that the amount received as non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights is not chargeable to capital gains tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru Bench 'A', dated 10.07.2009. The respondent-assessee, M/s Khivraj Motors, had declared capital gains of Rs. 1,76,88,000/- towards the full value of consideration of a property plus Rs. 20 lakhs received as a non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights for the assessment year 2005-06. The Assessing Officer, by order dated 28.12.2007, assessed the capital gains at Rs. 2,30,14,568/- plus Rs. 20 lakhs. The assessee challenged this before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who allowed the appeal, holding that the amount of Rs. 20 lakhs received for surrender of tenancy rights was not chargeable to capital gains tax. The revenue appealed to the ITAT, which confirmed the order of the Commissioner. The revenue then filed the present appeal before the High Court. The High Court framed the substantial question of law as to whether the amount of Rs. 20 lakhs received as non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights is chargeable to capital gains tax. The court noted that the issue was covered by a previous decision of the same court in the case of the same assessee for an earlier assessment year, where it was held that tenancy rights are not a 'capital asset' under Section 2(14) of the Act, and therefore, the amount received for surrender of tenancy rights is not taxable as capital gains. Following that decision, the High Court dismissed the appeal, answering the question in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Capital Gains - Surrender of Tenancy Rights - Non-refundable deposit received for surrendering tenancy rights is not chargeable to capital gains tax as tenancy rights are not a 'capital asset' under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the amount received is not taxable as capital gains (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amount of Rs. 20 lakhs received by the assessee as non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights is chargeable to capital gains tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The amount of Rs. 20 lakhs received as non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights is not chargeable to capital gains tax.

Law Points

  • Capital gains
  • Tenancy rights
  • Non-refundable deposit
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Section 45
  • Section 2(14)
  • Section 55(2)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (06) 72

ITA No.775/2009

2015-07-14

Vineet Saran, Aravind Kumar

K.V. Aravind, G. Kamaladhar (for appellants), A. Shankar, M. Lava (for respondent)

The Commissioner of Income Tax and The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

M/s Khivraj Motors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by revenue against order of ITAT regarding taxability of amount received for surrender of tenancy rights.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside the order of ITAT and confirm the assessment order including Rs. 20 lakhs as capital gains.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by ITAT order holding that amount received for surrender of tenancy rights is not taxable as capital gains.

Previous Decisions

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed assessee's appeal; ITAT confirmed that order.

Issues

Whether the amount of Rs. 20 lakhs received as non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights is chargeable to capital gains tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the amount is chargeable to capital gains tax. Assessee contended that tenancy rights are not a capital asset and hence not taxable.

Ratio Decidendi

Tenancy rights are not a 'capital asset' under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore, any amount received for surrender of tenancy rights is not chargeable to capital gains tax.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench ‘A’ dated 10.07.2009. Brief facts of the case are that: For the assessment year 2005-06, respondent – assessee had declared capital gains of ` 1,76,88,000/- towards the full value of consideration of the property plus ` 20 lakhs received by the assessee as non-refundable deposit in lieu of surrendering tenancy rights. The issue is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of the same assessee for the assessment year 2004-05.

Procedural History

Assessing Officer assessed capital gains including Rs. 20 lakhs. Assessee appealed to CIT(A) who allowed the appeal. Revenue appealed to ITAT which confirmed CIT(A) order. Revenue then filed appeal under Section 260A before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 260A, Section 2(14), Section 45, Section 55(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Decree Against Deceased Partner Not Executable Against Legal Representatives. Partnership Dissolved on Death of Partner Under Section 42(c) of Partnership Act, 1932, and Legal Representatives ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Non-Refundable Deposit for Surrender of Tenancy Rights Held Not Taxable as Capital Gains. The court ruled that the amount received as non-refundable deposit in lieu of sur...