Search Results for "bona fide declaration"

1002 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1002 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeal, Dismisses Suit for Cancellation of Partition Deed Due to Failure to Prove Duress. Power of Attorney Holder Cannot Testify on Party's State of Mind; Adverse Inference Drawn Against Plaintiff for Non-Examination.

The litigation arose out of a suit filed by the father against his daughter-in-law seeking cancellation of a partition deed and perpetual injunction. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Consent Letter and Delay in Tenancy Transfer in Irani Wadi Case; Finds Consent for Convenience Not Relinquishment and Transfer Lacks Bona Fides. Joint Tenants’ Rights Not Extinguished by Mere Consent Letter; Twenty-Year Delay and Protest Letters Negate Bona Fide Transfer.

The dispute concerned the immovable property known as Irani Wadi at Mazgaon, comprising a residential bungalow, a nursery, and rooms for gardeners, he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010102062008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SAFEMA Notice Against Family Members of Convicted NDPS Offender. Property Attachment Under SAFEMA Sections 68A-68I Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome.

The petitioners, Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan, Junaid Ebrahim Khan, Faizal Ebrahim Khan, Imran Ebrahim Khan, and Afzal Ebrahim Khan, are family members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...