Search Results for "birth entry"

605 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 605 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Correction of Date of Birth in Service Record Based on Birth Certificate Under Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. Representation made within one year of joining is within permissible period; birth certificate is reliable evidence.

The petitioner, Pravin Yeshwante, was appointed as Manager under order dated 24.04.2008 and joined duties on 20.05.2008. His date of birth was entered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 5(i),(j)(ii),(l)/6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Shashikant Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Special Case No.19/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Review Application in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review of dismissal of writ petition challenging non-consideration of claim for correction of date of birth rejected as review not an appeal in disguise.

The applicant, Taterao s/o Mahadu Bagul, an Additional Collector in Nandurbar, filed a review application (Stamp No.22202 of 2016) before the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against MAT Order Allowing Date of Birth Correction. Amendment to Rule 38(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 2008 Lifts Five-Year Bar for Employees Joining Before 16.8.1981.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 10.9.2009 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Premature Retirement Based on Date of Birth Discrepancy. Petitioner's claim of correct date of birth as 1st June 1950 rejected as service record showed 18th March 1947 and no application for correction was made within reasonable time.

The petitioner, Yashwant G. Tambe, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging his premature retirement from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Accused in Murder Case — Age Determination Issue Not Proven. Appellant failed to establish juvenility on date of offence despite claiming birth date of 6/7/1983, as evidence from school and birth records was inconsistent.

The appellant, Amit @ Bapu Nanasaheb Bhandwalkar, was convicted in a criminal case and filed Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2005 before the Bombay High Cou...