Search Results for "automatic termination"

203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Management's Petition in Teacher Termination Case — Full Backwages Denied for Lack of Pleading. Oral Termination Set Aside but Backwages Not Automatic Under Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The petitioners, Nava Samaj Mandal and Nitin Godiwala Junior College of Commerce, challenged the judgment and order dated 1 October 2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Absorption of Reserved Panel Candidate After Panel Expiry. Direction to absorb respondent as Technician in All India Radio set aside as it violated Recruitment Rules and the limited right of a candidate in a reserved panel.

The Union of India and All India Radio appealed against a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court's direction to absorb the respondent, as a Technic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Part, Enhances Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Instead of Reinstatement. The Court held that reinstatement is not automatic for daily wage workers and monetary compensation is appropriate, especially when the dispute is raised after a long delay.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Uttarakhand against the High Court's order directing reinstatement of a daily wage worker (Beldar) who had...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partnership Act Bar Case — Agreement Held as Licence Not Lease. Suit for Eviction by Unregistered Partnership Firm Not Barred Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Right to Evict Trespasser Arises from Common Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by M/s Hotel Satkar, an unregistered partnership firm, against the dismissal of their suit for eviction of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...