High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards for Local Body Elections. Petitions Seek Quashing of Final Notification on Reservation Alleging Arbitrariness and Violation of Draft Notification.
14 Jan 2019...
Search Results for "article 115"
1417 result(s) found
Found 1417 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition Challenging Reservation in Government Tenders for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Petitioner Asserts that Amendment to Section 6 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and Insertion of Rule 27(A) Providing 17.15% and 6.95% Reservation for SC/ST in Works up to ₹50 Lakhs Violates Constitutional Rights.
20 Dec 2019The petitioner, a Class-I contractor enrolled with the Karnataka Public Works Department since 2008-09, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Acquisition Reference Petitions, Holding That Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits Is Not Permissible Under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Civil Court Has Inherent Power to Restore Such References Under Section 151 CPC.
29 Mar 2016The judgment concerns multiple civil revision petitions filed by landowners (petitioners) against orders of the Senior Civil Judge at Koppal dismissin...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Defendant's Petition and Dismisses Plaintiff's Revision in Summary Suit — Conditional Leave to Defend Upheld but Deposit Reduced. Court held that while the trial court had discretion to impose conditions under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC, the condition of depositing 50% of the suit claim was disproportionate and reduced it to 25%.
10 Oct 2014The case involves two petitions arising from an order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.8306/2012...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in SARFAESI Matter Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Petitioner Had Already Filed Applications Under Section 17 Before DRT, Rendering Writ Petition Not Maintainable.
3 Jul 2020The petitioner, Chandrashekar H.S., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a ...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Civil Revision Application Against Condonation of Delay and Restoration of Suit for Specific Performance Dismissed in Default. The Trial Court's Order Condoning Delay of 5 Years 9 Months and Restoring Suit Under Order IX Rule 9 CPC is Challenged on the Ground of Bar to Second Restoration Application.
14 Aug 2013The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance (Spl.C.S. No.74/1997) filed by the respondent’s father (since deceased) against the revision ...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition for Delivery of Possession Under Order 21 Rule 95 CPC — Decree Holder Entitled to Possession After Court Sale Confirmation. The court held that once a court auction sale is confirmed, the purchaser has a right to delivery of possession under Order 21 Rule 95 CPC, and the executing court cannot dismiss such application.
30 Apr 2014The petitioner, the decree holder in O.S.No.222/1996, had obtained a money decree against the respondent for Rs.1,15,500/-. In execution proceedings (...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation for Local Body Elections. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seek to Quash State Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Reservation.
14 Jan 2019The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a large batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The peti...
- 35
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Remand to Executing Court in Lease Renewal Dispute — Executing Court Must Determine Whether Decree Permitted Extension Beyond 2013. The High Court's exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC was upheld as the Executing Court's order disposing of execution was final and no other remedy existed.
24 Sep 2019The appellant, M/s Bagalkot Udyog Limited, was a lessee under the respondents pursuant to a lease deed dated 19.11.1952 for 30 years ending on 31.03.1...
- 129
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.
1 Jan 1970The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...
- 59
