Search Results for "arbitrary scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrary scheme"

2617 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2617 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Policy in Loan Waiver Scheme for Small and Marginal Farmers Under Article 14 Scrutiny. Classification Based on Landholding Found Rational and Non-Arbitrary, with Judicial Review Limited to Constitutional Compliance, Not Policy Wisdom.

23 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a loan waiver scheme introduced by the Government of Tamil Nadu through G.O Ms. No. 50 dated 13 May 2016, which provided waiver...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

20 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

10 Sep 2015

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in SVLDRS Scheme Case — Rejection of Form 1 Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Held Eligible for Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Despite Pending Audit.

13 Sep 2023

The petitioner, P. N. Gadgil & Sons Ltd., a manufacturer and seller of gold/silver articles and jewellery registered under the Central Excise Act, fil...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Reimbursement of Medical Expenses to Retired Air Force Officer in ECHS Case — Denial of Claim for Lack of Prior Approval Held Arbitrary. The court held that denial of reimbursement for treatment at an empanelled hospital based on lack of prior approval was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

8 Jul 2019

The petitioner, a retired Squadron Leader of the Indian Air Force who served in the 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pak wars, sought reimbursement of medical expen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Housing Board Allotment Regulations Amendment — Classification Based on Income and Location Not Arbitrary. Challenge to Reservation Categories A and C under Regulation 4 and 9A of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983 fails as reasonable classification under Article 14.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Bhojappa K, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Eligibility Certificates Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993 — Holds That Industrial Units Commencing Production After 1.1.1999 Are Entitled to Benefits Under the Scheme Despite Government Resolution Dated 7.5.1993 Being Superseded by Resolution Dated 31.3.1999. The Court Ruled That the Scheme Continued to Operate for Units Which Had Applied and Were Eligible Under the Earlier Resolution, and That the Respondents Could Not Deny Benefits on Ground of Non-Issuance of Eligibility Certificate.

25 Jul 2012

The petitioners, four industrial units (Shraddha Polymats, Raj Industries, Alpha Plast, and Jayesh Chandulal Shah), filed writ petitions under Article...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)